LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

a probelm about VS-TUN

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: a probelm about VS-TUN
From: hewt@xxxxxxxxxx (He Weitao)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 21:52:31 +0800
hi,all
    thanks to wensong for the IPVS project first,and thanks
all the others for maintaining and developement it.

    I wander two questions:
1. how many realservers can be extended in the VS-TUN method?

2. the realservers in VS-TUN can use private IP such as 192.168.1.0?

                      _________ 202.103.88.221
                     |          |  (director have 2 NICs)
                     | director |
                     |__________|192.168.1.1
                          |
                          |
                          |
          ------------------------------------
          |                  |               |
          |                  |               |
          |                  |               |
    ____________      ____________    ____________
   |            |    |            |  |            |
   | realserver |    | realserver |  | realserver |
   |____________|    |____________|  |____________|
   192.168.1.2(eth0) 192.168.1.3(eth0) 192.168.1.4(eth0)
    VIP(tunl0)            VIP(tunl0)    VIP(tunl0)

    the director and realservers are all linux (2.2.14),all NICs are 100M.
    if the director have two NICs, eth0(202.103.88.221),eth1(192.168.1.1),
then does the VIP should be 202.103.88.221?
    To realize the Virtual Server in this way, does all the throughput
SHOULD pass through director? then I am afraid it will be the bottleneck of
whole system? can I make the realservers connect directly to client?
    could someone give some comments?
thanks.

ttao



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>