LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: poor performance using hidden arp method

To: Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: poor performance using hidden arp method
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 01:08:14 -0500 (EST)
Hmm...well I'm using qmail actually for my MTA.  Is there a way to do the
equivelent with qmail that you know of?  Or anyone else on the list?

I'll look into it.  This could be something, but why would using the
redirect method work better?

-jeremy

> 
>       Hello,
> 
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I noticed very poor performance using the hiddne arp methods with
> > Linux.  Basically I followed the web page example exactly, and it did
> > work, but response was very slow.  I switch to using the redirect ipchains
> > method and it was fine.
> > 
> > I want to make sure I didn't do anything wrong though.
> 
>       Nothing is wrong in your LVS configuration.
> 
> > 
> > IP Virtual Server version 0.9.8 (size=8192)
> > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> >   -> RemoteAddress:Port          Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> > TCP  imp.xxx.com:smtp wlc
> >   -> imp3.xxx.com:smtp        Route   10     0          1         
> 
>       Did you read the LVS HOWTO? There is a hint to clear the
> ident timeout in /etc/sendmail.cf. From the HOWTO:
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> identd problems:
> Sendmail can't use identd when running on an LVS.
>  
> Edit your sendmail.cf file and set the value
> Timeout.ident=0
> -------------------------------------------------
>  
>       Is this problem solved?
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> --
> Julian Anastasov <uli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 


http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>