LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS working great.. but...

To: Clint Byrum <cbyrum@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS working great.. but...
Cc: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Lvs-Users <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 14:24:11 -0400
Clint Byrum wrote:
> 
> The director is the default route for all of the mentioned machines. It, of
> course, has a route to each of the internal subnets, so things get routed as
> they should. It just seems like there's a tiny piece missing that doesn't
> demasquerade the replies from the load-balanced server, but instead, just
> routes it. So, to answer succinctly,
> 
> 1. no
> 
> 2. yes

OK one more then. Do you have a demasquerade rule with
-s realservers -d internalclients?

Joe


-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>