|
So I'm trying to use fwmark and I'm running into problems. I'm using the
UltraMonkey examples and I think where I'm having the problem is with the
192.168.0.0/24 network example. My cluster is setup using 10.2.9.0/24.
floating ip is 10.2.9.5
ld1 and ld2, 10.2.9.2, and 10.2.9.3
real servers
web1-3, 10.2.9.10-12
So I decided to use 10.2.20.0/24 in place of the 192.168.0.0/24 in the
example.
As far as I can tell I had things exactly as they instruct in the example.
On real server lo:0 was config'd for 10.2.20.0
ipchains was accepting all, but I did do the ipchains -A input -d
10.2.20.0/24 -m 1 and added the route for 10.2.20.0/24 to gateway via the
vip, 10.2.9.5.
and ipvsadm used ipvsadm -A -f 1 vip1:80 and ipvsadm -a -f -1 -r
webtest1:80, etc.
so did all this and it did not work...so the only thing looking fishy to
me is my use of 10.2.20.0/24. Any ideas what I could be overlooking?
Also is there any real performance advantages to using fwmark? I guess
the cool thing is it easily allows me to use other services, right?
Thanks
-jeremy
|
