LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: fwmark questions.

To: Jeremy Hansen <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: fwmark questions.
Cc: "Thomas A. Morris" <morrist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:57:01 -0700
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 06:26:47PM -0400, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> 
> Hmm, so you're using the NAT approach... I'm trying to do it with
> DR.  Horms, straighten me out :-)

Fwmark will work with NAT, DR and TUN. If your DR boxes are
to be used as the default gw then you need to fix some proc values,
I have _not_ had success in doing this in the past. The alternative
when using DR is to set up another box as the gateway for outgoing
traffic for the real servers.

> > Real servers dont need anything other than to think that the Director is 
> > the route for
> > all return packets
> > to clients.
> > 
> > >
> > > Also I see that your port in your ipvsadm output is 0.  Can you explain
> > > this?
> > >
> > 
> > I dont specify any ports , simply use the fwmarks. In the ivvsadm commands, 
> > I use -f
> > <marknumber>  for all the virtual service addresses.
> > 
> > Tom
> > 
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---------------------------------------------
> 
> 

-- 
Horms


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>