|
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Ed Wiseman wrote:
Do you want to load balance HTTP/HTTPS or do you want a two tiered
solution?
The latter seems awfully complicated.
The first solution can be done with 1 layer using VS-DR and either
persistance or the fwmark solution that Ted Pavlic posted this weekend
(to keep clients on the same machine when they go from http to https).
Joe
> Hi All. I am configuring a High Availability LVS solution for two (or more)
> web sites. I am have configured NAT based LVS to perform the load balancing
> at each of the two sites and it works great. However, I would like to be
> able to use LVS to load balance HTTP and HTTPS between the two sites that
> are already running LVS NAT load balancing - a two tiered approach. I've
> been leaning towards a LVS Tunnel solution so that I would have a master
> director that would have a tunnel to the LVS NAT server at each site. I
> have a tunnel running between the two NAT load balancing servers but I
> cannot get the NAT portion to load balance when I send traffic to it through
> the tunnel. Is this the correct approach to multi-site load balancing?
> Will this two tiered approach work. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Ed
>
> I.D.M.S. Inc.
> Professional Services! Exceptional Solutions!
> 215 Dawlish Avenue
> Aurora, Ontario, Canada L4G 6P9
> Phone: +1(416)410-6947
> http://www.iadms.com
>
>
>
>
>
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
