LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Need help setting up a LVS with NT real servers

To: Jules Herr <julesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Need help setting up a LVS with NT real servers
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 16:13:07 -0400
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:57:10PM -0400, Jules Herr wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've been trying to set up my virtual server using piranha on redhat 6.2.
> Here's what it looks like
> 
> 
> --------------Internal network (10.4.20.0/255.255.255.0)---------
>                                          |
>                                          |
>               ------------------------------------------
>                       |    Linux Virtual Server         |
>                       |           active router            |
>                       |    eth0   =10.4.20.200         |
>                       |    eth0:1=10.4.20.220         |
>                       |    eth0:2=10.4.20.222         |
>                       |                                         |
>                       |    eth1  =192.168.1.1          |
>                       |    eth1:1=192.168.1.254      |
>                       |       (NAT Router)               |
>               ------------------------------------------
>                                          |
>                                          |
> --------------Server network (192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0)---------
>                    |
>                    |
> --------------------------------
> | Real Server 1
> | NT4.0 Server
> | 192.168.1.3
> | Default gateway:
> |  192.168.1.254
> --------------------------------
> 
> At the moment I'm only trying to get the lvs going with one router and only 
> one real server. I plan on adding more servers once I've made contact.
> 
> I'm trying to use the virtual server to imitate a cisco local director by 
> using NAT and IP masquerading. Has anyone had success here?
> 
> I've set up the router with two NICs with two virtual IP's on eth0 (the 
> general network), and with one virtual ip on eth1 (the server network). Its 
> my understanding that the virtual ip on the server network (192.168.1.254) 
> will be the address used for routing packets from the server network back 
> out to the general network.

This is just a stab in the dark, but I believe that piranah should
be left to bring up the IP aliases. That is you should _not_ configure
eth1:1 .


-- 
Horms


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>