LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: 2.2.18

To: "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: 2.2.18
From: Patrick Panzenboeck <PatrickP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:03:54 -0600
with multiple lvs i mean haveing more then one vs on a box.

in regards to redhat, can i still use the piranha config tool with IPVS
1.0.2 and ipvsadmn that you guys distribute or do i need to use something
else?

thanks patrick

-----Original Message-----
From: Horms [mailto:horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:34 PM
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.2.18


On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:45:48AM -0600, Patrick Panzenboeck wrote:
> i am new to lvs, well i installed lvs in the summer on two of our severs
> but, had to deinstall it because multiple lvs support didn't work. so now
i
> am back and installed lvs 1.0.0 for kernel 2.2.17 on a original red hat
> distribution. 

Multiple lvs support? What does this mean?

> does ipvsadm 1.0.0. for kernel 2.2.17 report IPS and ports in hex where
> 0.96, I think it was reports the ip in dotted form. Or did I do something
> wrong? BTW what version do you guys recommend for a mission critical
> cluster?

To my knowledge all versions of ipvsadm as supplied from
linuxvirtualserver.org and mirrors report IP addresses in dotted quad.  I
believe that Red Hat has/does ship a version of ipvsadm patched to report
addresses in hex. The reason for this is unclear other than it seems to be
a compatinbility issue with Piranah.

I would recomment the latest verion of IPVS as it has all the latest
bug fixes. If you wish to use Piranah you should use whatever
version of LVS and ipvsadm are shipped with Piranah.

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wenzhuo Zhang [mailto:wenzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:04 PM
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: 2.2.18
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:18:11AM +0100, smajer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi All
> > 
> > I guess only the following changes are necessary to successfully aplly
> against
> > 2.2.18
> > 
> Agreed. I applied ipvs-1.02-2.2.17 against kernel 2.2.17 first and
> then applied kernel patch-2.2.18. Everything works like a charm.
> 
> Wenzhuo
> 
> > --- ipvs-1.0.2-2.2.17.patch     Sun Dec  3 05:39:27 2000
> > +++ ipvs-1.0.2-2.2.18.patch     Tue Dec 12 10:27:10 2000
> > @@ -194,7 +194,8 @@
> >  @@ -271,6 +272,32 @@
> >         NET_IPV4_CONF_BOOTP_RELAY=10,
> >         NET_IPV4_CONF_LOG_MARTIANS=11,
> > -       NET_IPV4_CONF_HIDDEN=12
> > +       NET_IPV4_CONF_HIDDEN=12,
> > +       NET_IPV4_CONF_ARPFILTER=13
> >  +};
> >  +
> >  +/* /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs */
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > greetings
> > 
> > stefan majer
> > x-cellent technologies gmbh
> > rosenkavalierplatz 5
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

-- 
Horms

_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>