Re: reccomended NIC

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: reccomended NIC
From: Wayne <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 12:35:45 -0800
I use Intel cards, since 3Com cards had once locked up
the LVS box during stress tests.  Never had that problem 
with Intel cards.

At 08:20 PM 12/26/00 +0000, Lorn Kay wrote:

>3com and Intel cards are a good choice. I am using both in production. 
>See their web sites for the latest Linux driver modules which you can 
>download, compile and load into your system (on Red Hat via /etc/conf.modules 
>for example).
>>From: Florin Andrei 
>>Reply-To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>To: LVS users 
>>Subject: reccomended NIC 
>>Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 10:37:08 -0800 (PST) 
>>I did some research on the mailing list archive, but i 
>>was unable to find a match for this problem... 
>>I understand that system latency is a critical 
>>parameter for LVS. So, a fast network interface card 
>>(NIC) might be an advantage for the balancer box. 
>>What NICs do you reccomend for using in a LVS 
>>balancer, on Intel architecture? 
>>Is there an FAQ for LVS? I think this question is a 
>>typical FAQ entry... 
>>Florin Andrei 
>>Do You Yahoo!? 
>>Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. 
>> mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>or go to 
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at 
>_______________________________________________ mailing 
>list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to 
>lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>