LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: LVS-NAT

To: "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: LVS-NAT
From: Robert Carroll <RCarroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:39:58 -0500
well I figured that..

I trying to get this to work with out talking to the network admin.
They already have NAT working in front of this setup.  I had LVS_DR working
but it would not work outside the local network.  Without stepping on toes I
figure I try the LVS_Nat solution.

Long story short, I cant change the VIP or it wont go thru the other NAT.
At least thats what I think its doing.

Confused,
Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Thornton Prime [mailto:thornton@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 1:33 PM
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT


> Robert Carroll wrote:
> 
> Stupid question maybe.. using lvs_nat.. does the director have to be
> on two different network segments, or can it be the same?
> 
> for example
>     director IP: 192.168.168.126
>     VIP: 192.168.168.200
>     real1: 192.168.168.121
>     real2: 192.168.168.125
> 
> I know this may look dumb.. but just wonder if it would work?

I think it would probably work, but as far as I can see you would be
taking on all the disadvantages of NAT and eliminating most of its
advantages.

thornton

_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>