LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: non name based web hosting question

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: non name based web hosting question
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 09:41:00 +1100
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 03:21:32PM +0100, Chris wrote:

Chris is correct. This is exactly the scenario the fwmark support was
implemented for.

> Hi,
> 
> I think you can use the fwmark option for the
> loadbalancing
> 
> you can mark the incomming pakackes with an
> ipchains rule like
> ipchains -A input -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d 192.168.0.0/24 -m 1

ipchans -A input -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d 172.16.0.0/24 -m 1

> then 
> 
> you can setup your LVS like
> 
> ipvsadm -A -f 1 -s wlc 
> ipvsadm -a -f 1 -r 10.10.10.15 -g
> ipvsadm -a -f 1 -r 10.10.10.16 -g
>   .
>   .
>   .
> 
> 
> ps. the cisco should then point to the LB
> 
> cu,
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> > Ian Courtney wrote:
> > 
> > Just been playing with lvs for the last week or
> > so, and have gone though a little of the mailing
> > list, but have yet to find a good answer to my
> > problem.
> > 
> > 
> > Basically here at our ISP, we tend to have 2-3
> > Class C's worth of hosting per server. We would
> > like to move the the LVS, but I'm not exactly
> > sure how I should be setting it up.
> > 
> > Our setup:
> > 
> > Normally:
> > The machine has a static ip, lets say
> > 10.10.10.15, and two Class C's , 192.168.0.0/24
> > and 172.16.0.0/24, both class C's have explicit
> > routes on our cisco router to 10.10.10.15.
> > 
> > I need to know how to integrate this method into
> > our network using lvs. I know I have to change
> > the route to point at the Director, but from
> > there I'm kinda  lost. Does the director need to
> > have all the Class C's present on the
> > RealServers aliased?
> > 
> > I've also thought of setting up a route for each
> > Class C to each Realserver using them, but that
> > would kind of render the LVS useless as it
> > wouldn't be doing the round robin, the routing
> > would (if that would even work).
> > 
> > A bigger problem for me is a head, this is
> > currently just for 3 Class C's for our CGI
> > users, our normal Unix webspace is the next to
> > get LVS'd, but there is probably 18 class C's
> > involved in that space, and I don't think Linux
> > will handle having 18 Class C's aliased to a
> > single machine.
> > 
> > Any help is greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ian Courtney
> > Systems Unix Administrator
> > CADVision Internet
> > (http://www.cadvision.com)
> > A division of PSINet inc. [NASDAQ PSIX]
> > 300 - 5th Avenue SW, Suite 1810
> > Calgary, Alberta
> > Email: ianc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Phone: (403) 777-1300
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

-- 
Horms


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>