LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH][RFC]: followup ...

from [Henrik Nordstrom] [Permanent Link]
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]: followup ...
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:06:20 +0100 
Roberto Nibali wrote:

> >         I agree, some firewalling can be done before the balancer
> > but when the normally looking traffic comes only the balancer knows
> > for open/closed ports, related ICMP, etc. The main things
>
> Unless you put a proxying firewall ;)

In which case you should not need LVS for load balancing...

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Safecore Technologies
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: can LVS be run ON the firewall box?, Thierry Mallard
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH][RFC]: followup ..., Roberto Nibali
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH][RFC]: followup ..., Julian Anastasov
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH][RFC]: followup ..., Roberto Nibali
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]