|
Hi,
Very nice ascii sketch!! How long did this take to draw?
> Hi, every one.
>
> How are you?
Fine, how are you?
> There is a problem about traffic load.
>
> We have used two kind of cpus to test the traffic load. One is Celeron566, and
> the
> other is Pentium3-700. The result is the following:
>
> Celeron566 ------ 1050 Req/Sec
> Pentium3-700 ----- 700 Req/Sec
I don't believe it. This must be a wrong setup or a damaged hardware component.
Its impossible that a lousy Celeron is faster then a P3. Sorry pal, such is
life.
> The web monitoring tool is WebBench4.0.
Never tried but this is not the point anyway.
> [Enviroment]
>
> +-----+
> | |
> | CL1 +----+ +------------+
> | | | | RS1 |
> +-----+ | | CPU P3-550 |
> 192.168.0.16 | +-----+ MEM 128MB |
> +-----+ | | | W2K |
> | | | | |192.168.0.61|
> | CL2 +----| | +------------+
> | | | Director | +------------+
> +-----+ | +---------------------+ | | RS2 |
> 192.168.0.17 | |CPU Celeron566/P3-700| | | CPU P3-500 |
> +-----+ +----|MEM 128MB |---+-----+ MEM 64MB |
> | | | |Linux Kernel 2.2.15 | | | Linux |
> | CL3 +----| |LVS 0.9.13 | | |192.168.0.62|
> | | | |192.168.0.51 | | +------------+
> +-----+ | +---------------------+ | +------------+
> 192.168.0.100| VIP:192.168.0.3 | | RS3 |
> +-----+ | Schedule:LC | | CPU P3-450 |
> | | | HB:Ping HTTP +-----+ MEM 128MB |
> | CL4 +----+ | Linux |
> | | |192.168.0.63|
> +-----+ +------------+
> 192.168.0.110
I assume you're using LVS_DR seeing your setup. But why are you using
2 NICs? To avoid the arp-problem? So the DGW for the all RS is the LB?
With this setup the replies must travel back through the director and
then you have the performance problems of LVS_NAT. Please change the
setup to the LVS_DR setup depicted in the howto. And then we might
check out your problem again.
> I kon't know why the higher the frequency of cpu is, the slower the traffic
> is.
It's impossible IMHO. But YMMV,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
mailto: `echo NrOatSz@xxxxxxxxx | sed 's/[NOSPAM]//g'`
|
