Either there is a genuine misunderstanding of the question or the answers
are just skirting round the edges.
Is the code that your company wrote to 'add tighter communications between
director and web servers and the GUI to control all machines in the cluster'
to be released under the GPL?
Did you just take LVS add your fancy bits round the edge and then put this
up for sale for profit? (and not giving back to the community which made
your 'for profit product' a product?)
----- Original Message -----
From: "zen kishimoto" <zen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Joseph Mack" <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>; <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: LVS Direct Routing Performance testing results
> Our use is strictly based on GPL. We did not change
> LVS (on the director). However, we added code
> to have tight communications between Director
> and web servers. We also added GUI to control
> all the machines in the cluster.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph Mack" <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
> To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <zen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:06 AM
> Subject: Re: LVS Direct Routing Performance testing results
> > zen kishimoto wrote:
> > >
> > > No, we did not change the LVS code but
> > > added more.
> > so it's under GPL too?
> > Joe
> > --
> > Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
> > contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
> > mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users