Pawel Kisiel wrote:
> > I'm confused. You have both NAT and DR? Why do you differentiate
> > between in the internet and 10.10.0.0 in this diagram?
> I'm not doing LVS-DR on this linux box.... I'm only doing LVS-NAT for
> 10.10.1.0/24 network.... This 10.10.0.0/24 network is developers network
> in my company.....and LVS-NAT and 10.10.1.0/24 are in DMZ...
> The network topology in this diagram is familiar to real one in
> my company....and to DMZ I have normal direct routing...but clients from
> internet they have to have only access to LVS-NAT box.....
> But as I wrote in my last e-mail ports that are mapped on LVS-NAT
> are no longer available for people from this private network.....
I'm still confused.
Please restate the problem without using the term "direct routing"
and with only 2 connections to the director.
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA