LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

iptables, Best choice for an H.A. Cluster

To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: iptables, Best choice for an H.A. Cluster
From: "Federico" <egopfe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:55:22 +0100
I'm planning to make a Linux Firewall Cluster running iptables.
I've some doubt, It's the first time for me to make a cluster.
My firewall box is for first a router, wich control routing between
different DMZs and LAN.

So I must keep routing for first, then firewalling.

I've found that an only heartbeat cluster, is not a REAL H.A. solution,
beacause if a selected interface goes down (there are many reason) the
heartbeat doesn't make the hypotetical second node to keep services. This
beacuse is hard to realize if a route goes down, not only interface... If
was only interface I've made a simple SNMP script that checks the interface,
but I must keep routing.

I've tough this way, and I wanna discuss them with yours.

A load balancing Firewall-Iptables-Cluster, so If an interface of one node
goes down, the second interface keeps routing to other nets.

Now I wanna now your opinions and if Virtual Server can help me to build
this kind of cluster.

Thank you in Advance




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • iptables, Best choice for an H.A. Cluster, Federico <=