LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Can LVS do this?

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Can LVS do this?
From: Wayne <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 09:08:28 -0800
This is a good topic to start another open source project :-)
Actually, there is at least one open source project about
this kind of thing.

There are software out there that allow monitoring the multiple
connections and change the DNS resolution so that users
being directed to the best connection.  However, the major
issue is that the browser client's DNS record about your site
will not expire right away.  It normally expires in few hours
or few days.

By the time your ISP's DNS record changed and your
connection directed to the other server connections, your
first choice connection might already restored to normal.
But you are now stuck with this DNS record that may
point to a server that is not your first choice.....

The DNS record not expire right away was considered a
good design by many, but it become a problem when
you trying to use it to redirect traffic....


At 10:46 AM 2/27/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>A friend and I are trying to grow a struggling-little-shoestring-
>budget-net-business.  We're trying to position ourselves so that we 
>can handle larger numbers of clients, but are finding that the least 
>impressive part is our internet service providers.
>
>We have solid hardware running FreeBSD, Apache, and Mysql off of a 
>business grade DSL line.  But there are times when our ISP gets 
>bottlenecked and even though our server is sitting on its thumbs, 
>waiting for requests, the clients are not getting good response time.
>
>What I would like to do is set up N systems located in different 
>places with different ISPs and then set up some sort of external 
>monitor that can watch them and direct traffic... balance traffic not 
>only based on load but on performance.  Is this something that LVS 
>can do?
>
>I've looked at the drawings on http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/, 
>and they all seem to have a single point of failure on the network 
>drop.  Additionally, they seem to route traffic through a single 
>location (even if there are redundant managers at that location).
>
>Does anyone out there know (and hopefully can explain it in small 
>words as I am new at LVS) a way to improve our immunity to crappy net 
>service?
>
>Thanks,
>Gre7g.
>
>=================================================================
>Gre7g Luterman   gre7g@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.templeofluna.com/
>Stay informed: http://www.templeofluna.com/keeper/mailinglist.htm
>                      Internet junkie: Turn on, log in, drop out.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>