|
Hello,
Sorry for the html I am using a web interface to send these
posts.
I hope this is now in ascii.
One thing I have noticed is when setting TCP logging on the
wingate router (win98) machine and then connecting to the
director on port 80 I do not see any loging for the
connection from the director.
It looks like the director is not forwarding the requests
onwards!
Another point I should make the Director is a matrox server
with a pre installed linux kernel that fasthosts have built.
The info from uname =
Linux server1 2.2.19-6.2.7 #1 Thu Jun 14 06:57:47 EDT 2001
i686 unknown
I checked the modules and found these already installed on
the server.
ls -l /lib/modules/2.2.19-6.2.7/ipv4/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11148 Jun 14 2001
ip_gre.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4928 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_autofw.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2756 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_cuseeme.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6564 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_ftp.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 11596 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_ipsec.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4196 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_irc.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6440 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_mfw.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5004 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_portfw.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7624 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_pptp.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3328 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_quake.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5332 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_raudio.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7736 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_user.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3188 Jun 14 2001
ip_masq_vdolive.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6684 Jun 14 2001
ip_vs_lblc.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8144 Jun 14 2001
ip_vs_lblcr.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3144 Jun 14 2001
ip_vs_lc.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3144 Jun 14 2001
ip_vs_rr.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3184 Jun 14 2001
ip_vs_wlc.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3636 Jun 14 2001
ip_vs_wrr.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9244 Jun 14 2001
ipip.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6208 Jun 14 2001
rarp.o
OS = Matrix Server Type 1 Red Hat Linux release 6.2
ipvsadm was not available so I installed
ipvs-1.0.8-2.2.19.tar.gz (pls note I did not patch the
kernel)
I run the commands :-
ipvsadm -A -t 212.20.20.2:80 -s rr
ipvsadm -a -t 212.20.20.2:80 -r 192.55.55.81 -i -w 1
and it appeared to work as the ipvsadm command returned
this :-
IP Virtual Server version 1.0.6
(size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler
Flags
-> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight
ActiveConn InActConn
TCP 212.20.20.2:80 rr
-> 192.55.55.81:80 Tunnel 1 0 0
But as mentioned above when I telnet to 212.20.20.2 on port
80
I see 1 InActConn and I do not see any TCP activity at
192.55.55.81 (the Winroute router)?
Are the ip_vs_... modules specific to LVS?
Can these modules be available even if the kernel has not
been patched with ipvs-1.0.8-2.2.19.tar.gz?
Would the ipvsadm commands appear to work if the kernel has
not been patched?
The problem I have is that I do not want to build a new
kernel (unless I am absolutely sure that it is the kernel
at fault) as I have no physical access to this machine I
can only telnet remotely. If I build a kernel that does not
work I have no way of restore the original.
Thank you for your on going help.
SG
______________________________________________________________
Get Your Free E-mail at http://www.prontomail.com
|
