|
> I have been evaluating the various failover options as of late- I
> wanted to get other's opinions and the pros/cons of using one
> solution
> over another...namely, VRRP, heartbeat, and ldirectord.
> Currently we use
> heartbeat in production, and it works well. I'm curious to
> how well each
> of these will scale, and of course, the stability of each option. Any
> and all insight is appreciated- thanks!
keepalived - more features, more "concentrated" to LVS, less stable
(software is not nearly as well tested).
heartbeat+ldirectord - works fine, very stable, easy to upgrade. it's what
I use.
If I had to start over again I would consider using keepalived. This is not
because I am unhappy with the heartbeat package; it's simply because
keepalived has some nice features I want - active/active, less messing
around with programs such as "mon", etc.
Hope that helps
P
|
