LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: fwmark with port set to :0

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: fwmark with port set to :0
From: "Matthew S. Crocker" <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:03:16 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Leonard Soetedjo wrote:

> 
> I'm not so sure I get what you mean.  Do you mean that, for telnet, even if I 
> have set the fwmark using iptables (let's say to 1), and added
> 
> ipvsadm -a -f 1 -r RS1:0 -g -w 1
> 
> The director would still load balance on all ports? i.e., whatever the value 
> of the fwmark, if the port is 0, then director will load balance on every 
> port.  So, for example, an incoming port 80 would be load balanced too?
> 

No, I was confused I thought you meant you were selecting all ports into 
the fwmark with an iptables command.  I'm pretty sure :0 is ignored in 
this instance.

-Matt

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew S. Crocker 
Vice President / Internet Division         Email: matthew@xxxxxxxxxxx
Crocker Communications                     Phone: (413) 746-2760
PO BOX 710                                 Fax:   (413) 746-3704
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710                  http://www.crocker.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>