|
> It doesn't matter. IPVS will treat any host with a local IP address as
> localnode.
That is what I gathered from the docs, but since Joe suggested it, worth a try
I felt.
> I just wanted the *IP* routing table not the *IPVS* one. On both
> machines please.
1:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
10.122.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default 10.122.254.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
2:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default orangeweb 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
> First netmask mistake. It's not really a big problem as long as it's set
> with way on all machines around, but network 10.0.0.0 is a class A
> network, so its netmask is 255.0.0.0.
Strange, that is the value the Redhat gui defaulted to, and the value that
every machine on the corporate LAN has for it's netmask (>200 machines)
>why the hell do you have a 192. address on the public interface whereas
>it's a private address ?
Because of getting a 10.x IP address allocated by sys admin so is like getting
blood from a stone...
I'm waiting on permission to assign other IPs to the machines.
> OK, here is the way you should probably set the IP stuff :
I'm going to go and try and get all that sorted out now. Thanks, you've been
VERY helpful.
> In lvs.cf you should have a nat_router line or something close. If
> you're using piranha-gui, you've forgotten a field.
ah yeah.. Cheers.
> But whatever version of piranha you're using, you won't be able to do
> what you initialy wanted to (2 boxes, acting both as RS and directors)
> without applying one of my patches (you'll find them on the piranha
> mailing list).
You mean patches to the Piranha gui? Or patches to the LVS system?
Thanks
Mike
|
