LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Fail Over

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Fail Over
From: "AJ Lemke" <aj.lemke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:45:09 -0500
I am using version 0.4.c from your Ultramonkey product.
Thanks for the info I will check out that list.

AJ


-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Horms
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 7:37 AM
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Fail Over


On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:42:41AM -0500, AJ Lemke wrote:
> Hello List,
> 
> I am running a 2 Node Cluster with fail over using Heartbeat.  We 
> recently have come to notice that when the Primary Node(Director1) is 
> taken down or fails the Secondary Node(Director2) takes upto 6 minutes

> to assume the Virtual IP's.  Sometimes the Director2 doesn't take over

> at all.  Heartbeat checks the servers every 2 seconds and the Deadtime

> is 10 seconds.  If I restart the heartbeat service on both Nodes they 
> seem to work within  15 seconds the first couple of tries but then 
> they seem to get confused as Director2 will not give up its resources 
> when Director1 comes back on line.  This is tested by shutting off the

> port on the switch or by starting and stopping the Heartbeat service.

> Any ideas as to what could be causing this problem?

That is very strange. Which version of heartbeat are you using?

As always, heartbeat related questions are best asked
on the linux-ha or linux-ha-dev mailing lists.
Information on these can be found on www.linux-ha.org.

-- 
Horms
_______________________________________________
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>