LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [CFT/PATCH] second try: backport of the RS thresholdlimitationpatch

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [CFT/PATCH] second try: backport of the RS thresholdlimitationpatch for 2.4.x kernels
From: Roberto Nibali <ratz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 22:40:30 +0200
Hi,

julius wrote:
a rr for ircds runs now, but most of the parameters that are shown in ipvsadm 
--help outputs something like this :
root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/# ipvsadm --numeric
Try `ipvsadm -h' or 'ipvsadm --help' for more information.
root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:/# ipvsadm --sort Try `ipvsadm -h' or 'ipvsadm --help' for more information.

Try ipvsadm --list --numeric as it is shown in the man page or the --help output. Just for your information: --numeric is an option and options only make sense in conjunction with commands. So in your example the command would be --list.

Granted, we could make the --list the default command but this is not how software design is done normally :)

the max cons can be set by the threshold parameter right ?

Yes, with -x for the lower treshold and with -y for the upper threshold. Again make sure you check out ipvsadm --help, it should give you all information you need. If not, we have to fix it.

Also note that I have given you an output of my test in a previous email in this thread.

Thanks for doing the tests,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>