|
--- Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> ken price wrote:
> >
> > You're absolutely correct in manually setting up
> > masquerading on the director. It's not handled by
> > LVS/Keepalived.
>
> whoa. You don't have to set up masquerading at all
> in 2.4 kernels
> for LVS to work.
My bad. I should have been more specific. In a
LVS-NAT setup using a 2.4 kernel, you're correct. in
my experience, I have NEVER had to MASQ or SNAT the
director for LVS to work. A client could make a
connect to the real server and pull content.
HOWEVER.
For the real server to initiate an outgoing connection
through the director, like the server pinging the
client in this case, I've ALWAYS had to setup
masquerading. LVS alone was never enough. If I'm
wrong here, I apologize.
-Ken
>
> > > The purpose of this setup is to test an LVS
> cluster
> > > on my private network.
>
> you don't say if this is LVS-NAT or LVS-DR
>
>
> > > ---------------
> > > | Client |
> > > | (My Laptop) |
> > > |192.168.1.100|
> > > ---------------
> > > |
> > > ----------------
> > > | 192.168.1.50 | < Virtual IP 192.168.1.250
> > > | Director |
> > > | 192.168.2.50 | < Virtual IP 192.168.2.250
> > > ----------------
>
> I don't understand why you have 2 VIPs and why you
> have
> x.x.x.50 and x.x.x.250 pairs
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing &
> Scientific Visualization
> SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC
> 919-541-0007
> Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 -
> smith.johnb@xxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list -
> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to
> lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to
http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
|
