Re: LVS-DR where Directors are also Realservers

[Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>]

Horms wrote:

> > If IPVS likes the packets (according to the virtual server
> > definition) he can grab them, else they go in their own way.
> > I do not see other gains for the user settings by removing the
> > local delivery.

While you're rearranging everything, will you be able to have firewall 
rules at the same time (ie handle the Antefacto patch problem)?

http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/Joseph.Mack/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.patches.html#firewall_on_director

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualization
SAIC, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007
Federal Contact - John B. Smith 919-541-1087 - smith.johnb@xxxxxxx