|
I use the noarp module and it works fine.
There is a compile warning on 2.4.20 kernel but I believe its OK.
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 23:57, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Probably a FAQ, but havent found anything on the subject so here goes....
>
> There's not much about it.
>
> > Have any of you been using the noarp module (www.masarlabs.com/noarp) ? I
>
> I haven't used it because I either use the hidden or the policy routing
> approach.
>
> > have tried it on a test server and it seemes to work as expected, but I
> > would like to know if anybody uses it before I put it into production.
>
> I'm sure some have.
>
> > Up untill now we have been using the hidden patch (by Julian) but would
> > really like to be able to use standard kernels.
>
> How can you call your kernel with an active LKM a standard kernel? And
> don't you have to recompile the module too? So what's the difference
> between compiling the kernel and that module? Also note I for example do
> not have any compilers on my nodes, either LB or RS.
>
> If you really do not want to touch anything around the kernel, you
> should probably try out one of the lesser suggested methods using
> iproute2 to blackhole the VIP.
>
> http://www.linux-vs.org/docs/arp.html
>
> Check section 3: The policy routing approach.
>
> Best regards,
> Roberto Nibali, ratz
--
Graham Purcocks <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Weather Services International Ltd
|
