LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: ip_vs_ftp module

To: ariyo@xxxxxxxxxx,<lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ip_vs_ftp module
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:00:01 +0900
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:56:51PM +0700, Ariyo Nugroho wrote:
> Hi Horms! Hi everybody!
> 
> Yes, Horms, you're right. LVS-NAT works well with ftp. I did like what
> you told me: insmod the ip_vs_ftp module.And then I add ftp service to
> ipvsadm table, make it persistent. Using fwmark, I also opened all ports
> 1024:65355. 
> 
> But, something strange happened. I just wonder, what would happen if I
> don't have ip_vs_ftp loaded? So, I rmmod ip_vs_ftp, and ... It still
> works! 
> 
> Hmm.. what does it mean? Why it can happen? It shouldn't work right?
> 
> BTW, would you please explain to me, what actually ip_vs_ftp does?

Did you test this with both active and passive mode ftp?

-- 
Horms
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>