LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: [Keepalived-devel] antefacto 2.6 linux patch necessary?

To: Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Keepalived-devel] antefacto 2.6 linux patch necessary?
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: keepalived-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 14:06:10 +0300 (EEST)
        Hello,

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Peter Mueller wrote:

> > I'm trying to figure out what precise functionality this
> > antefacto patch
> > affords, and if its necessary when using Linux kernel 2.6 (2.6.4 in my
> > case).  I'm trying to follow the HOWTO found here:
>
> This thread will be interesting to you..
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=106216529013985&w=2
> especially
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=106257440107168&w=2
>
> BTW, the latest version is from Julian's site,
> http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nfct/
>
> Regarding 2.6, I'm afraid I can't help you there.  I don't think there is a
> 2.6 patch yet.  Besides, are you sure you want to use 2.6 in production with
> its version so small?

        For all that find this feature useful, today I uploaded 2.6 
version but it is not tested.

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>