LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: TR: Connection tracking with lvs

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: TR: Connection tracking with lvs
From: Stéphane Klein <sklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:08:44 +0200
Hello,

Do you think that i can install this patch on a 2.6.8 kernel version?
I can't find the patch you told me, can you give me the link.

Again, than you very much for your help!

Stephane

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Julian Anastasov [mailto:ja@xxxxxx]
Envoyé : dimanche 29 août 2004 07:14
À : Stéphane Klein
Cc : 'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Objet : Re: TR: Connection tracking with lvs



        Hello,

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Stéphane Klein wrote:

> > But , i've tried to use your example to setup active and passive FTP.
> > I can authenticate, but i can't list or send data. I can see packet
> > in the conntrack file that with dport=20, but the ftp server tried
> > to send a SYN_SENT and have no reply.
> >
> > ip_vs_ftp is loaded as module
> > ip_nat_ftp and ip_conntrack_ftp are in the kernel
> >
> > I used iptables rules of your example in the HOWTO.
> >
> > I saw this article where you said it's necessary to patch the
> > kernel to work
> > with ip_nat_ftp
> > (http://www.in-addr.de/pipermail/lvs-users/2004-June/011955.html)
> > That patch is for kernel 2.6.5. Is this patch included in
> > your nfct patch or is
> > it necessary to apply this patch?

        Yes, it is needed if you are loading ip_nat_ftp. I didn't
received any replies from the netfilter coreteam about this patch,
so I just linked it to the web site: ip_nat_ftp-2.6.5-1.diff

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>