LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Replacing turboclusterd with LVS

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Replacing turboclusterd with LVS
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:07:44 +0900
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 10:09:02AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Thursday 25 November 2004 05:27, pmjbf@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I am in the process of modernizing this web cluster.  I want to replace the
> > load balancing functionality with LVS.  I have set up two new servers with
> > Debian (sarge), kernel 2.6.8 with IPVS 1.2.0 and ipvsadm v1.24.  I have
> > also installed keepalived v1.1.7.
> 
> I also began to set up an LVS cluster with failover and the like but ran into 
> one issue with kernels >=2.6.8 when 2.6.9 had not yet been released. The 
> details are here:
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109691785004004&w=2
> 
> However, I just checked the 2.6.9 sources and the above patch hasn't been 
> applied. It may be fixed in some other way, but more likely it was just 
> forgotten. Anyway, I suggest that you do some testing with high load to see 
> if you can reproduce it.

That change still does not appear to have been merged into the kernel
bitkeeper tree.

-- 
Horms

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>