LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Ldirectord starting problems

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Ldirectord starting problems
From: Deputy Michael <Michael.Deputy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:18:38 -0500
Contents of haresources:

oailxwbtst 10.90.2.194 ldirectord::/etc/ha.d/ldirectord.cf

Dep

-----Original Message-----
From: Graham David Purcocks M.A.(Oxon.) [mailto:grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:11 AM
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: Ldirectord starting problems



The information you supply is telling you why. You run it by

ldirectord{-d} <configfile> start

to start it so typing

ldirectord -d  /etc/ha.d/ldirectord.cf

is wrong. You are missing the start command.

However if you are using heartbeat that will start it correctly.

What have you got in haresources?

Graham

On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 16:59, Deputy Michael wrote:
> I have been trying to get load-balancing and fail-over working for about a
> week now and just can't seem to figure out what I am doing wrong.  I have
> followed the instructions on the ultramonkey site foe the streamline high
> availability and load-balancing.  Everything seemed to go well, except I
can
> not get ldirectord to start.  Here is my configuration:
> Two servers running CentOS 4.0.  I have Apache installed on both machines
> and have created a hidden file at the web root called .check with the word
> alive in it.  If I http://realserver/.check it comes back with alive.
> 
> My ldirectord.cf file looks like this:
> # Global Directives
> checktimeout=3
> checkinterval=1
> fallback=127.0.0.1:80
> autoreload=yes
> logfile="/var/log/ldirectord.log"
> logfile="local0"
> quiescent=yes
> 
> virtual=10.90.2.194:80
>       real=10.90.2.69:80 gate 
>       real=10.90.2.116:80 gate
>       fallback=127.0.0.1:80 gate
>       service=http
>       request=".check"
>       receive="alive"
>       virtualhost=oailcwbcl1.ssfhs.org
>       scheduler=rr
>       persistent=600
>       netmask=255.255.255.255
>       protocol=tcp
>       checktype=negotiate
> 
> When I try to start in debug mode his is the results:
> [root@oailxwbts2 ~]# ldirectord -d  /etc/ha.d/ldirectord.cf
> DEBUG2: Running exec(/usr/sbin/ldirectord -d /etc/ha.d/ldirectord.cf)
> Running exec(/usr/sbin/ldirectord -d /etc/ha.d/ldirectord.cf)
> DEBUG2: Usage ldirectord [-d] [configfile]
> {start|stop|restart|try-restart|reload|force-reload|status}
> Type ldirectord -h for more information
> Usage ldirectord [-d] [configfile]
> {start|stop|restart|try-restart|reload|force-reload|status}
> Type ldirectord -h for more information
> DEBUG2: Exiting with exit_status 1: Initialisation Error
> Exiting with exit_status 1: Initialisation Error
> 
> This is the contents of my log file:
> [Wed May 18 13:34:46 2005|] Usage ldirectord [-d] [configfile]
> {start|stop|restart|try-restart|reload|force-reload|status}
> Type ldirectord -h for more information
> [Wed May 18 13:34:46 2005|] Exiting with exit_status 1: Initialisation
Error
> [Thu May 19 09:24:55 2005|ldirectord] Usage ldirectord [-d] [configfile]
> {start|stop|restart|try-restart|reload|force-reload|status}
> Type ldirectord -h for more information
> [Thu May 19 09:24:55 2005|ldirectord] Exiting with exit_status 1:
> Initialisation Error
> [Thu May 19 10:43:19 2005|] Usage ldirectord [-d] [configfile]
> {start|stop|restart|try-restart|reload|force-reload|status}
> Type ldirectord -h for more information
> [Thu May 19 10:43:19 2005|] Exiting with exit_status 1: Initialisation
Error
> 
> When I type IPVSADM I get this result
> [root@oailxwbts2 ~]# ipvsadm
> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.0 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
>   -> RemoteAddress:Port           Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
> 
> I have been reading through the archive and googleing on ldirectord and
> ldirectord.cf most of the morning and really haven't found anything that
> point me to a cure.  If I change my haresources to load httpd instead of
> ldirectord::ldirectord.cf fail-over works fine between my two servers
using
> the virtual name.  I'm sure I'm missing something.  Can anyone point me in
> the right direction?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> > Michael Deputy
> Senior Systems Engineer
> Alverno Information Services
> 317-532-7800 x6287
> Michael.Deputy@xxxxxxxxx
> http://www.alverno.org
> 
> 
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> __________________________________ 
> The information contained in this email and any accompanying documents is
> intended for the sole use of the recipient to whom it is addressed, and
may
> contain information that is privileged, confidential, and prohibited from
> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or
> authorized to receive this on behalf of the recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any review, use, disclosure, copying, or distribution is
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the
> sender by e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank
you.
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
-- 

____________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________ 
The information contained in this email and any accompanying documents is
intended for the sole use of the recipient to whom it is addressed, and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential, and prohibited from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or
authorized to receive this on behalf of the recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, use, disclosure, copying, or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the
sender by e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>