LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LVS-NAT Active FTP issue...

from [Joseph Mack NA3T] [Permanent Link]
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT Active FTP issue...
Cc: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:41:36 -0800 (PST) 
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, Mark de Vries wrote:


I don't think that would help much. The src port is not always the same.
vsftpd (prolly) just connects without binding to a specific port, just
getting a random one in the ip_local_port_range...


so I only need to put in a note of caution in the HOWTO?


Is there anything against not matching on the src port like the
ip_contrack(_ftp) stuff?


you mean figure out the data-port on the fly?

Joe

--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Help with ip_vs_ctl.c~ipvs-deadlock-fix patch and RedHat ES 4, Roberto Nibali
Next by Date:  Re: Does lvs syncd handle persistent connections?, Ranga Nathan
Previous by Thread:  Re: LVS-NAT Active FTP issue..., Mark de Vries
Next by Thread:  Re: LVS-NAT Active FTP issue..., Mark de Vries
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]