LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Stats for a webserver

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Stats for a webserver
From: Todd Lyons <tlyons@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:55:07 -0800
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:15:30PM -0800, Mark wrote:

>I think what Joseph meant was whether they get mingled in a way that a line 
>(or log entry) of server A hits the log in the middle of
>writing an entry for server B, thereby destroying both entries and causing 
>syntax errors.
>Could that happen, or is something making sure that it will not?

Oh, I see.  In that case, no one hosts line will be interrupted but
another hosts's line.  The lines will be intermingled, but they will be
complete.  Here's an example:

Dec 23 11:48:09 smtp2 sm-mta[7171]: jBNJm7WM007171: Milter add: header: 
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=30.5 required=5.0 
tests=BAYES_99,DRUGS_ERECTILE,\n\tDRUGS_MALEDYSFUNCTION,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,\n\tHTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY,\n\tNO_REAL_NAME,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_SBL,\n\tURIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
 autolearn=no version=3.1.0-gr0
Dec 23 11:48:09 smtp2 sm-mta[7171]: jBNJm7WM007171: Milter: data, reject=550 
5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin
Dec 23 11:48:09 smtp2 sm-mta[7171]: jBNJm7WM007171: to=<dianag@xxxxxxxxxx>, 
delay=00:00:01, pri=30500, stat=Blocked by SpamAssassin
Dec 23 11:48:09 smtp1 sm-mta[10021]: jBNJm8o0010021: 
from=<qylyrxy@xxxxxxxxxxx>,size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA, 
relay=[82.131.161.22]
Dec 23 11:48:09 smtp2 spamd[26407]: prefork: child states: IIIII
Dec 23 11:48:09 smtp1 sm-mta[9872]: jBNJlQPs009872: <asing@xxxxxxxxxxx>... User 
unknown
Dec 23 11:48:09 smtp1 sm-mta[10010]: jBNJm3SU010010: ruleset=check_rcpt, 
arg1=<admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, relay=24-176-185-20.dhcp.reno.nv.charter.com 
[24.176.185.20] (may be forged), reject=550 5.7.1 <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>... 
Relaying denied. IP name possibly forged [24.176.185.20]

-- 
Regards...              Todd
OS X: We've been fighting the "It's a mac" syndrome with upper management
for  years  now.  Lately  we've  taken  to  just  referring  to  new  mac 
installations  as  "Unix"  installations  when  presenting proposals  and 
updates.  For some reason, they have no problem with that.          -- /.
Linux kernel 2.6.12-12mdksmp   3 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.16, 0.11

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>