|
On Fri 20 Jan 2006 14:53:18 GMT , Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
he has a one-network LVS-NAT
<snip>
My bad, not readin gback far enough again. Sorry.
In the case of LVS-NAT, the ARP problem simply doesn't exist
for his case it does.
OK, so the same rules apply as for LVS-DR - you'll need to suppress ARP
announcements/replies from the dummy VIP interfaces on RS1/RS2, or
you'll stop load balancing properly.
That considered I think that for a single VIP LVS-NAT, whether
one-network or two, this is a good - and simple - solution.
Graeme
|
