Re: LVS-NAT or direct routing or...?

[Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 22 May 2006, Graeme Fowler wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 10:49 -0700, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> > so this traffic is not on a port that ipvsadm is
> > controlling and LVS ignores these reply packets?
> That's the general idea.
I had quite forgotten that you could do this.

http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.3-Tier.html#client_on_realserver_snat

I remember how delighted I was when someone figured out that 
you could have packets emerging from the VIP and not from 
the primary IP
Joe

--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml 
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!