LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LVS-NAT + SNAT is it impossible?

from [Joseph Mack NA3T] [Permanent Link]
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT + SNAT is it impossible?
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:19:51 -0700 (PDT) 
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Paulo F. Andrade wrote:
The problem is that after LVS changes the VIP to RIP for inbound connections, it seems that packets don't traverse the POSTROUTING chain to get SNAT'ed.
there is a problem with LVS-NAT outbound routing. See if this rings any bells 

http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-NAT.html#brownfield

the patch for the 2.6.16 ipvs is attached

Joe

--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!















[More with this subject...]










<Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread>



















Previous by Date: 
Re: LVS synchronization problem, Joseph Mack NA3T




Next by Date: 
TCP retransmissions and DUP ACK and FINs, Robinson, Eric




Previous by Thread: 
Re: LVS-NAT + SNAT is it impossible?, Paulo F. Andrade




Next by Thread: 
Léon K., cindy angotti




Indexes: 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists]