please excuse me for not having written that the director is also running on
The topology is like in the following link:
On Monday 25 September 2006 14:17, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Dirk Umlauffd wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I've set up an LVS for a redundant DNS service on two redhat boxes:
> > VIP: 10.0.0.20
> > RIP's: .21 and .22 on the same network as the VIP.
> you have one director and two realservers?
> it looks like you have one realserver with a weight of 1000
> and one with a weight of 1 (guessing what the conf file is
> doing). If so they should be the same.
The weight of the two servers is correct, I want one to respond all requests,
if it's alive, the other one shall only respond if the first is dead.
> > Everything works fine, exept if the named on the "master" (.20) fails,
> since you don't have a back up director, you don't have a
> master either?
> > then I
> > recieve the answers from 10.0.0.22 instead of 10.0.0.20.
> maybe I don't understand your setup yet
Mit freundlichen Gruessen, regards