|
Todd Lyons wrote (at Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:32:40PM -0700):
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:29:13AM -0700, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Casey Zacek wrote:
> >
> >>Correct me if I'm wrong, please, but I believe what should have
> >>happened was that all traffic should be directed to the only remaining
> >>active RS once the failed RS gets deleted.
> >only new traffic. Read the HOWTO.
>
> I'm missing something. You're saying there is no difference between
> setting the weight of a RS to 0 and deleting that RS?
There sure should be. It doesn't make any sense that IPVS would route
any traffic to a RS *at all* that does not presently *exist* in the
LVS server tables.
--
Casey Zacek
Senior Engineer
NeoSpire, Inc.
|
