I tried a similiar configuration and got loss of performance once I enabled
statefull inspection. ipvs and statefull are two things which one shouldn't use
>>> Gustavo Mateus <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 26.02.2007 um 14:07 in
> Probably this issue was already discussed here but I did not find the
> messages related.
> I'm creating a Active-Active structure to host several virtual servers
> with 2 directors. About 40 to 50 real servers will be connected to this
> 2 directors.
> The idea is to use those guys as firewalls too, statefull, for common
> services (80, 443, 21, 25).
> Because of that we need to use LVS-NAT for our load balancing solution.
> My questions are:
> - LVS-NAT can handle 50 servers?
> - Is it ok to use the director as a firewall too?
> The directors are very good servers - Dell pe1950 Intel Xeon 5110 Dual
> Core de 1.60 Ghz with 2 GB of ram ( we still have the possibility to put
> one more processor on each director)
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users