Re: Antw: LVS-NAT

[Gustavo Mateus <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Looking at the docs 
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-NAT.html#lvs_nat_performance 

/"Don Hinshaw //dwh (at) openrecording (dot) com 04 Aug 2001
Cisco, Alteon and F5 solutions are all NAT based. The real limiting 
factor as I understand it is the capacity of the netcard, which these 
three deal with by using gigabit interfaces."/
Not using the director as firewall, just for load balancing:
What do you think is the LVS-NAT limit on a xeon dual core 1.60 Ghz with 
2 GB of ram and gigabit connected?
The info on the documentation seems to be kind of old, does anybody have 
some fresh experience using nat and more than 20 real servers?


Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Gustavo Mateus wrote:
>
> > And about LVS-NAT?
> > Is it still the least scalable?
> The LVS-NAT code from 2.4.x on is as fast as LVS-DR.
>
> > How many RS is the limit?
> don't know of anyone who's tried that many at full blast.
>
> If you're going to use LVS-NAT directors as firewalls, read the 
> relevent sections of the HOWTO.
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users