Re: SNAT Confusion

["Rodre Ghorashi-Zadeh" <rodrico7@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Then what functionality does the NFCT patch provide that the LVS-NAT doesn't 
out of the box?
~Rodre


> From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." 
> <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." 
> <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: jkrzyszt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: SNAT Confusion
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
>
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Rodre Ghorashi-Zadeh wrote:
>
> > I understand that Julian's patch will not help me, but in trying to put an 
> > end to my confusion:
> > Doesn't the LVS-NAT automatically change the RIP source address back to 
> > the VIP address as it traverses the director by default (without the NFCT 
> > patch)?
> yes
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net 
> - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml 
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
_________________________________________________________________
Your Space. Your Friends. Your Stories. Share your world with Windows Live 
Spaces. http://spaces.live.com/?mkt=en-ca