LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Is it worth reading on?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Is it worth reading on?
From: Kyrios <kyrios@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:16:48 +0200
Okay. LVS is not what I'm looking for. At least for now ;)

Thanks again!

Thorsten

*note to myself* Please please heartbeat list be as fast and friendly as the
LVS list :)

On 6/28/07, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Joseph Mack NA3T wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Kyrios wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >
> > Bill has already addressed most of your issues, but I'll at
> > least confirm what he's said.
> >
> >> I'm searching a solution to cluster Gameservers. The solution should
> make
> >> Gameservers (which are unique through the used TCP/UDP Port)
> >
> > unique for listening port?
> >
> > If so, you can use LVS. For LVS all realservers must be
>
> sorry s/can/cannot/
>
> Joe
>
>
> > identical.
> >
> >> transparent to
> >> end users. Let's say I got 6 Realservers and I notice that Realserver
> #1 is
> >> under heavy load while Realserver #3 is nearly idle. Then I will stop
> the
> >> instance on #1 and launch it on #3.
> >
> > not on LVS. The director assumes that the realserver is up
> > or that it's crashed. You can't move connections.
> >
> > Mosix will move processes (and connections)
> >
> > Joe
> >
>
> --
> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>



-- 
... black holes are where god divided by zero.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>