LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] lvs didn't loadbalance properly when persistent mode is

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] lvs didn't loadbalance properly when persistent mode is on
From: Adrian Chapela <achapela.rexistros@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:37:34 +0100
Graeme Fowler escribió:
> On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 08:46 +0100, Adrian Chapela wrote:
>   
>> Yes, if you turn off persistence and you need sessions, your web app 
>> doesn't work well. I think this is one negative point of LVS, the 
>> application persistence mode. In most cases of web application we don't 
>> need IP persistence but we need persistence of application (sessions..).
>>     
>
> It's worth remembering that LVS is application-unaware. If you want
> something to do session persistence without IP persistence, you need
> some way of making all of your realservers aware of all the clients
> connecting to them - like memcached, for example.
>
> Saying that this is a negative point of LVS is like saying it's a
> negative point of TCP :)
>   
I don't it's a negative point, but the application persistence will be a 
good feature for LVS because realservers know all clientes will be a 
performance penalty.

My problem is because I am using IIS servers in my realservers and they 
need some database or another procedure to save sessions of all clients. 
I will take a look about memcached in Windows.
> Graeme
>   
Thank you! I love LVS!
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>   



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>