|
Hi Folks,
Has anyone configured multiple gateways on 2 NIC's.
Please guide me HOW-TO.
Thanks In Advance
Madan KN
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Madan KN <madan.kn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> *Hi,*
> Now on each realserver i have 2 Nic's. (ex: 192.168.1.58/192.168.2.58)
>
> My directory forwards all the requests on 192.168.1.58 n/w.
> I need to set the routing table on realservers that to use only director
> as gateway if destination is 192.168.1.0 n/w.
> For others use 192.168.2.0 n/w.
>
> The reason is my mysql connections take double the time if i use the
> director as gateway.
>
> Please guide me how to go about.
>
> Thanks,
> Madan KN
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Bgs <bgs@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > There is no howto about it afaik. It's absolutely not a standard setup.
> > Actually I've never seen it anywhere before, but I've been using it in
> > high traffic production level environment for quite some time. We can
> > use an arbitrary number of loadbalancers to distribute traffic on the
> > same frontend server park.
> >
> > Madan KN wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Can you please refer me to Howto documentation to acheive the
> > following
> > > below.
> > > Since am doing this for the first time, need some heads up.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Madan KN
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Bgs <bgs@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Example (I used it a lot in production level env): connmark the
> > traffic
> > >> coming from you director and mark it on output. The you can use
> > fwmark
> > >> to set up a routing table for the director. This way you can keep
> > your
> > >> normal default gateway on your realservers. You can also have
> > multiple
> > >> directors if you want using this method. Works like a charm :)
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Bgs
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Madan KN wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>> Thanks for reminding this, Can you please suggest me how will we
> > achieve
> > >>> this.
> > >>>
> > >>> Since all my traffic getting routed through Director. I want only
> > LVS
> > >> Port
> > >>> 8080 being routed through
> > >>> Director.
> > >>>
> > >>> Others using my default router hardware.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks In Advance,
> > >>> Madan KN
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 4:46 AM, bgs <bgs@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If you don't want to route all non-lvs traffic through your
> > director
> > >>>> (creating double traffic on you LAN and adding a spof), you can
> > also
> > >> mark
> > >>>> the traffic and use routing rules.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>> Bgs
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:17:23 +0530, "Madan KN" <madan.kn@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi Jason/Joseph,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks folks, It works :)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thank you again.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Madan KN
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2008, Madan KN wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
> > >>>>>>> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> > >>>>>>> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn
> > InActConn
> > >>>>>>> TCP 192.168.1.10:8080 rr
> > >>>>>>> -> 192.168.1.62:8080 Masq 1 0 0
> > >>>>>>> -> 192.168.1.60:8080 Masq 1 0 0
> > >>>>>>> -> 192.168.1.58:8080 Masq 1 0 0
> > >>>>>>
> > >>
> > http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.LVS-NAT.html#one_network
> > >>>>>> Joe
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
> > >>>>>> jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
> > >>>>>> generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
> > >>>>>> Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list -
> > >> lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>>>> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>>>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list -
> > lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>>> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list -
> > lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> > >>>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list -
> > lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> > >>>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list -
> > lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
> >
>
>
|
