LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Monitoring traffic

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Monitoring traffic
From: ipvs user <ipvsuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 12:12:07 -0700
[bl ~]# ipvsadm -l -n --stats
IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port               Conns   InPkts  OutPkts  InBytes OutBytes
   -> RemoteAddress:Port
TCP  192.168.1.2:80               686986 25647215        0    1474M        0
   -> 192.168.1.1:80               233736  8459668        0  499449K        0
   -> 192.168.1.1:80               191679  8245615        0  454602K        0
   -> 192.168.1.1:80               261571  8941932        0  520763K        0

[bl ~]# ipvsadm -l -n --stats --exact
IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port               Conns   InPkts  OutPkts  InBytes OutBytes
   -> RemoteAddress:Port
TCP  192.168.1.2:80               686987 25647233        0 1474815983        0
   -> 192.168.1.6:80               233737  8459686        0 499450161        0
   -> 192.168.1.5:80               191679  8245615        0 454602010        0
   -> 192.168.1.4:80               261571  8941932        0 520763812        0


Thomas Pedoussaut wrote:
> [ Yes I've read 
> http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.monitoring_lvs.html ]
> 
> I'm making my own monitoring tools (based on MRTG etc...) and I'm 
> currently gathering data from call to ipvsadm --stats -t .....
> That works fairly well but, and there is a but, the cmd line tool does 
> some formating like 11234k rather than the full value 11234567 which is 
> causing me trouble.
> I tried to access /proc/net/ip_vs* but there is nothing that I could 
> use. ip_vs_stats is a general counter, not one per VS.
> For the moment, I reset the counter atfer each read, but it's not great, 
> and the day my trafic will grow above the 1M per 5 minutes, I'm f#@4ed.
> 
> Any ideas welcome.
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>