Re: [lvs-users] Weighting by request address?

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Weighting by request address?
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:

> Here's a model that does what I want (but isn't supported by any current
> scheduler):

you could feed your resource values to feedbackd

> I was wondering if it worked that way.  That doesn't make much sense to me
> -- in real servers all processes draw from the same resource pools, so it
> doesn't make sense to firewall them that thoroughly from each other in
> scheduling.  But I imagine most real-world uses have only one virtual
> service?

the simple ones all do, but LVS has to be able to handle any 
number of virtual services. The director can't tell how many 
realservers aare behind it or whether the different virtual 
services are running on the same or different machines. The 
current way of assuming the serivces are independant is 
simple at least.

>> Your problem is at the application level. Can your batch
>> scheduler nice its jobs?
> Thank you!

hope it works


Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at
Homepage It's GNU/Linux!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>