LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] Are LVS / ldirectord Multithreaded?

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Are LVS / ldirectord Multithreaded?
From: Jeff Pang <jeff.pang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 09:09:48 -0700 (PDT)


--- On Fri, 10/31/08, Robinson, Eric <eric.robinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Robinson, Eric <eric.robinson@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Are LVS / ldirectord Multithreaded?
> To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." 
> <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing 
> list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 11:33 PM
> > problems with the HTTPS check leaking memory in the
> past, so I
> > would start by seeing if that is the culprit.
> 
> For anyone who is interested, my ldirectord.cf looks like

> #
> # Virtual Service for FTP, Outside to Inside
> virtual=192.168.5.100:21
>         real=192.168.10.61:21 masq
>         real=192.168.10.62:21 masq
>         service=ftp
>         request="checkup.txt"
>         receive="ftp_is_up"
>         login="load-balancer"
>         passwd="checkUp@now <mailto:checkUp@now>
> "
>         scheduler=wlc
>         protocol=tcp
>         checktype=negotiate
>         persistent=360


If I remember that correctly, FTP under masq doesn't need persistent.
There is a module in kernel handle it already.

-jeff


      


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>