Re: [lvs-users] Persistence related question

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] Persistence related question
From: Cristi <cere@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:38:50 +0200
I wasn't very specific, but I was refering to the conections initiated 
by ! So, will they be wrr-ed to both RSs?


Graeme Fowler wrote:
> Hi again
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 22:26 +0200, Cristi wrote:
>> Just one question: I currently use the wrr scheduler. Won't this change 
>> affect the scheduling process?
> If you want all requests from one source client to be served by one
> realserver, you have no scheduling to speak of (for those requests)
> anyway :)
> Think: you would be round-robin (weighted or otherwise) all connections
> between... one real server. So it doesn't matter.
> The beauty of using the MARK method is that you can separate your
> services out according to very, very specific criteria.
> Graeme

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>