LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord: same port number used with NAT and Direct Ro

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord: same port number used with NAT and Direct Routing + monitoring = problem
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:10:11 +1000
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:30:27PM +0000, Daniel Lemay wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here are some specs:
> 
>     os: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 (etch)
>     ipvsadm v1.24 2003/06/07 (compiled with popt and IPVS v1.2.0)
>     ldirectord  version 1.77.2.51

[snip]

> TCP  x.x.x.x:7777 rr
>   -> 192.168.58.56:7777           *Route*   1      0          0
>   -> 192.168.58.55:7777           *Masq *   0      0          0
> 
> TCP  192.168.58.4:7777 rr
>   -> 192.168.58.55:7777           *Masq*    0      0          0
>   -> 192.168.58.56:7777           *Route*   1      0          0
> 
> How can we explain the strange "coupling" with Route and Masq?

Hi Daniel,

This looks like a bug in ldirectord whereby it thinks
192.168.58.56:7777/Route and 192.168.58.55:7777/Masq are the same
thing and is using the same data structure to handle them internally.
I'll look into this.

Could you let me know how you installed ldirectord.
Was it using the Debian ldirectord package for etch, if so, which version?


_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/

LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>