|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lvs-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gustavo Mateus
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 10:23 AM
> To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS vs commercial LB in critical environment
>
> Siim,
>
> I use LVS for more than 3 years now, distributing requests to 60 web
> servers for airline companies B2C and B2B systems.
> One of my directors is up for 795 days, load avareged 0%, handling 300
> connections per real server and 40 Mbps os traffic constantly.
>
> You cannot go wrong using lvs and keepalived for failover protection.
> It is definitely one of the best piece of software I ever used.
>
Just as a note, we're load balancing a heck of a lot more connections per real
server, and a bunch more bandwidth than this without any problem.
Jason Faulkner
Linux Engineer, Rackspace Email & Apps
jason.faulkner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
o: (540) 443-2101 (ex. 505-2101)
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
